Impeachment: Aiyedatiwa Asks Ondo CJ To Decline Assembly’s Request To Constitute Panel
The ongoing battle between the deputy governor of Ondo State, Lucky Aiyedatiwa, and the state House of Assembly on Tuesday took another turn as the deputy Governor asked the Chief Judge of the State, Justice Olusola Odusola to ignore the request of the Assembly to constitute a seven-man panel of investigators into allegations of gross misconduct against him.
The request was contained in a seven-page letter written by Aiyedatiwa’s lawyer, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa (SAN), which was submitted to the Chief Judge in Akure, on Tuesday.
Osun Defender reports that a letter had been written by the Assembly to the Chief Judge on October 23, asking him to constitute a seven-man panel to probe the deputy governor, claiming that the orders of injunction granted by the Federal High Court, Abuja, have expired.
Aiyedatiwa in the letter delivered in the office of the Chief Judge said the position of the Assembly was based on conjectures, misconceptions, inconsistencies, undue desperation and misconstruction of the law, arguing that the orders granted by the Federal High Court, Abuja on September 26, 2023 are still in force and they remain valid and subsisting, contrary to the erroneous conclusion of the Assembly that the said orders have expired by operation of law.
According to him, dwelling on Order 26 Rule 10 (2) and (3) of the Federal High Court Rules 2019, the court in Abuja has been given wide discretion to determine the nature, status and duration of any order granted and “in this case, the court directed that the orders granted on 26th September 2023 should last till the hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice for interlocutory injunction, which is still pending before the court.”
The deputy governor stated in his letter that
the court has not set aside the pending orders and the order cannot be extinguished by the application to set it aside since it was combined with the hearing of the substantive suit based on the two proceedings of the Federal High Court, Abuja of October 9 and 16, 2023.
Aiyedatiwa said the Assembly is inconsistent with its claim that the orders have expired whilst, on the other hand, it is pursuing an appeal against the said orders.
He then queried whether the Assembly can approbate and reprobate at the same time by stating under oath in court that the orders are still valid and, pending while at the same time writing a letter to the chief judge, claiming that the orders have expired, quoting extensively from the motion filed by the Assembly at the Court of Appeal, Abuja, to show the malicious intent of the Assembly.
He said, “Contrary to this misconception of law and the facts, the same House of Assembly filed a Motion on Notice dated 20th October 2023, before the Court of Appeal, Abuja in respect of the same orders of the Federal High Court, praying for abridgement of time to hear its appeal against the said orders. If it is true that the orders expired by operation of law on 18th October 2023 as being falsely canvassed, why would the same House of Assembly file a fresh application two days later, in pursuit of its desire to set aside the said orders that it claimed have expired? While the Assembly is pursuing its appeal to set aside the orders in Court, it is deviously asking My Lord to set aside the same orders in Chambers, purportedly by operation of law.
“This appeal has once again brought to the fore the frequent impeachment of elected politicians we have witnessed in recent times. As serious as the matter is, the legislators have found a veritable weapon to exit the faces of those they don’t like. It should not be so. The process of impeachment must be strictly and duly observed so as not to thwart the will of the electorate freely expressed at the polls.
“Impeachment of elected politicians is a very serious matter and should not be conducted as a matter of course. The purpose is to set aside the will of the electorate as expressed at the polls. It has implications for the impeached as to the electorate who bestowed the mandate on him. Whether it takes one day or three months prescribed by law, the rules of due process must be strictly followed. If the matter is left at the whims and caprices of politicians and their panels, a state or even the entire Country could be reduced to the status of a banana republic. The procedure for impeachment and removal must be guarded jealously by the court.
“My Lord the Honourable Chief Judge is thus humbly urged not to accede to the request expressed in the letter of the Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly of 23rd October instant but to await the due determination of the various cases pending before the Courts and the appeal of the House of Assembly before the Court of Appeal,”
Kazeem Badmus is a graduate of Mass Communication with years of experience. A professional in journalism and media writing, Kazeem prioritses accuracy and factual reportage of issues. He is also a dexterous finder of the truth with conscious delivery of unbiased and development oriented stories.
